Thursday, August 12, 2010

The Best Ever Test Team – Where Does India Rank All-Time?

India is currently sitting atop the ICC Test team ratings points table with their highest ever total of 130. In this article I ran the ICC Test team rankings from 1877 (the current system has been in use only since 2003), and one of the things this allows us to do is find out who was the best ever Test team, by looking at the highest ratings points scored through the years. The results are very interesting – will it be the recent Aussie green machine, or the '80s Windies, or how about Bradman's 1948 Invincibles?

Here then is the list of the highest rated teams in Test cricket history, based on their ICC world ranking points at their peak:-

Pos

Pts (Gap)

Team

Year

Tms

1

143 (+34)

Australia

2007-08

9

2

134 (+21)

Australia

1959-60

7

3

133 (+25)

Australia

1951-52

6

4

132 (+29)

West Indies

1985-86

7

5

132 (+16)

Australia

2002-03

10

6

131 (+22)

West Indies

1964-65

7

7

130 (+41)

Australia

1924-25

3

8

130 (+11)

India

2009-10

9

9

127 (+70)

England

1890

3

10

125 (+29)

Australia

1935-36

6

11

125 (+8)

South Africa

1969-70

7

12

125 (-5)

Australia

1962-63*

7

13

124 (+25)

Australia

1975-76

6

14

122 (+19)

England

1956

7

122 (+19)

England

1971

6

16

122 (+8)

West Indies

1993-95

9

17

122 (+2)

South Africa

2009

9

18

121 (+34)

England

1928-29

4

19

121 (-7)

West Indies

1948*

6

20

120 (+17)

West Indies

1977-78

6

21

120 (-2)

Sri Lanka

2009*

9

The above list shows the peak number of points in the rankings, the gap between first and second (relative dominance), the team, which year they peaked, and the total number of teams ranked.

* Australia had the most points ever by a second-ranked team, behind the 1962-63 West Indians (130), who peaked in 1964-65. West Indies were second to the 1948 Australians and Sri Lanka second to India.

This table really highlights the constant strength of the Australian national side, the Aussies have no fewer than five of the top seven best ever sides, and eight of the top thirteen. Possibly the biggest surprise is the high ranking of Richie Benaud's young Australian side which hammered top-ranked England 4-0, and they finish just ahead of what was basically the 1948 Australians. The '80s Windies are next, though they were very dominant with a lead of +29 over the next best. India's current side fares very well, ranking as eight best ever.

But, fresh from their 5-0 thrashing of England the previous winter and following a comfortable victory over Sri Lanka, the very best ever, and by a significant margin, is the Aussie side of 2007-08. Allowing for the increased difficulty in achieving dominance as the numbers of good Test teams has increased over time, it's fair to say that they were also the most dominant, 34 points clear of three teams tied on 109 (South Africa, Sri Lanka and India).

Take a bow, Messrs Ponting, Hussey, Gilchrist, Warne, McGrath et al!

Is Sachin better than the Don?

To his legion of adoring fans, Sachin Tendulkar is the epitome of batsmanship. He is practically deified in his native India, but the adulation does not stop there, as he is highly regarded all over the cricket-playing world. Amongst cricket traditionalists however, Don Bradman is unquestioned as the best batsman to ever pad up – they merely point to his Test average of 99.94, far and away the best ever, and say "QED". The two of them have probably only ever been rivaled in terms of hero-worship by WG Grace, who was probably the most famous cricketer ever, at least the most recognizable outside of the cricket world.

So let's pose the question "Which batsman has had the most impact?" Actually, since there are so many drawn games in Test cricket, let's modify the question slightly, to "Which batsman should have had the most impact?" Let's look at batting success in terms of the number of high-impact innings played, and determine impact by looking at whether or not a particular innings of significance should, all other things being equal, have resulted in a win. In this way, we can attempt to equalize the team factor, i.e. try to take away the impact of being surrounded by a successful team.

Throughout Test cricket history, we can determine how often a particular innings of significance would, or should, be expected to contribute to a win in a Test match. As an example, let's take Tendulkar. Tendulkar numbers among his achievements 56 fifties, 29 tons, of which 14 were more than 150 and five of those double centuries - historically, each 150, for example, would be expected to prove the difference in a match around 23% of the time, which, for his fourteen 150s would give him around 3.2 win contributions to his team; in other words, if a player makes fourteen 150s, he should expect around three of them to be winning innings. We can calculate this figure for each of his major innings, then add them to give a total expected win contribution for Tendulkar, then do the same for all Test batsmen based on their major innings. Finally, we can adjust for era – for example, if Trumper scored a 90 it's much more likely to have had an impact than if Kevin Pietersen does so in today's game. If we do this, we come up with the following top 30:-

NAME

TM

PROJ

1. Sachin Tendulkar

Ind

11.48

2. Brian Lara

WI

10.04

3. Ricky Ponting

Aus

9.07

4. Don Bradman

Aus

7.95

5. Steve Waugh

Aus

7.65

6. Mahela Jayawardene

SL

7.47

7. Virender Sehwag

Ind

7.38

8. Jacques Kallis

SA

6.96

9. Rahul Dravid

Ind

6.83

10. Kumar Sangakkara

SL

6.72

11. Mohammad Yousuf

Pak

5.83

12. Matthew Hayden

Aus

5.33

13. Graeme Smith

SA

5.25

14. Justin Langer

Aus

5.03

15. Gary Kirsten

SA

5.01

16. Wally Hammond

Eng

4.98

17. Marvan Atapattu

SL

4.82

18. Inzamam-ul-Haq

Pak

4.46

19. Sunil Gavaskar

Ind

4.46

20. Len Hutton

Eng

4.38

21. Garry Sobers

WI

4.13

22. Neil Harvey

Aus

3.99

23. Younis Khan

Pak

3.94

24. Graham Gooch

Eng

3.92

25. Mark Taylor

Aus

3.90

26. Herschelle Gibbs

SA

3.78

27. Shriv Chanderpaul

WI

3.76

28. Mohammad Azharuddin

Ind

3.75

29. Jack Hobbs

Eng

3.75

30. Michael Vaughan

Eng

3.66


Tendulkar, Lara, Ponting and Bradman basically have 11.5, 10, 9 and 8 projected wins respectively which, considering the very small variations below them, are significant gaps. There are some surprises below the top four, but bear in mind this is measuring likely winning performances, so a mercurial batsman like Atapattu measures well despite his low average. The level of likely success of a given innings changes over time, plus this last ranking is based on totals and tends to favour players who batted in more Tests. But, that is, in the end, how we tend to measure greatness, not by percentages.

Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar, by this measure, is (or rather should have been) the most successful Test batsman ever.

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Hello cricket fans. This blog is an offshoot of http://www.chasingthedon.com/, where I'll be posting my various cricket ramblings, meanderings and hopefully, some interesting findings. Feel free to drop me an email at chasingthedon@gmail.com.

Thanks for reading and commenting!

Dave